Frameworks from Austria
| Questions | FBS - Fundierte Bankschuldverschreibungen | Pfandbriefe |
|---|---|---|
| I. STRUCTURE OF THE ISSUER | ||
| 1. Who is the issuer? |
|
|
| (1) Comments: Issuance of covered bonds is special operation in the banking licence that is approved by the regulator. | ||
| 2. Does the bondholder have recourse to the credit institution? |
|
|
| 3. Who owns the cover assets? |
|
|
| 4. Is the issuer the originator of the assets? |
|
|
| (2) Comments: But not necessarily. The issuer may include assets from other originators in its cover pool | ||
| II. FRAMEWORK | ||
| 1. Are the bonds governed by a special covered bond Legislation? |
|
|
| 2. What is the legal framework for bankruptcy of the issuer of covered bonds? |
|
|
| (3) Comments: Special provisions in the covered bond law besides general provisions. | (4) Comments: Not superseding, but additional to the general insolvency law | |
| III. COVER ASSETS | ||
| 1. What types of assets may be included in cover pools? |
|
|
| (5) Comments: Exposure to credit institutions only as deposits with financial institutions as defind in §2 Z 18 BWG of surplus cash up to 15% of the outstanding issued covered bonds. |
(6)
Comments: Point 1 and 3 for Public Pfandbriefe; Point 2 and 3 for Mortgage Pfandbriefe; |
|
| 2. What is the geographical scope for public sector assets? |
|
|
| 3. What is the geographical scope for mortgage assets? |
|
|
| (7) Comments: No explicit definition, but the same geographical scope as for public sector assets may be assumed. | ||
| 4. Are regular covered bond specific disclosure requirements to the public mandatory? |
|
|
| (8) Comments: Not yet but will become mandatory. | ||
| IV. VALUATION OF THE MORTGAGE COVER POOL & LTV CRITERIA | ||
| 1. LTV is calculated using which valuation?[4] |
|
|
| (9) Comments: No LTV limits for covered bonds at the moment. | ||
| 2. Are there any special LTV limits used solely for calculating collateralisation rates for the cover pool (if yes, specify)? |
|
|
| (10) Comments: 60% | ||
| 3. Do bondholders get the benefit of that portion of the loan which exceeds the LTV cap? |
|
|
| 4a. Is there an LTV cap which makes the entire loan ineligible to be put in the cover pool (if yes, specify)? |
|
|
| 4b. Is there an LTV cap which would require a loan to be removed from the cover pool? |
|
|
| 5. Is there any additional LTV limit on a portfolio basis? |
|
|
| V. ASSET-LIABILITY GUIDELINES | ||
| . Exposure to market risk | ||
| 1. Is exposure to market risk (e.g. interest rate, currency risks) required to be mitigated by law or contract? |
|
|
| (11) Comments: General rules for banks apply as the issuer is a regulated financial institution. | ||
| 2. What is the primary method for the mitigation of market risk? |
|
|
| (12) Comments: No obligatory stress tests, derivatives may be used to reduce future interest rate, foreign currency and credit risks. | ||
| 3. If the answer to the above question on market risk mitigation is “Use of derivative hedge instruments”, please specify whether those instruments are entered into: | ||
| (13) Comments: Derivatives may be entered into the cover pool at any time. | ||
| 4. What type of coverage test is applied? |
|
|
| (14) Comments: Nominal cover is minimum requirement; it can be replaced by present value coverage (to be fixed in the bylaws). | ||
| 5. What is the frequency of coverage calculations? |
|
|
| (15) Comments: To be agreed with commissioner. | ||
| 6. What types of stress scenarios are applied? |
|
|
| 7. What is the frequency of stress test calculations? |
|
|
| (16) Comments: Not obligatory by law. | ||
| . Exposure to liquidity risk | ||
| 8. Is exposure to liquidity risk required to be mitigated by law or contract? |
|
|
| (17) Comments: Not obligatory by law. | ||
| 9. What is the primary method for the mitigation of liquidity risk on interest payments? |
|
|
| (18) Comments: No mandatory stress test. | ||
| 10. What is the primary method for the mitigation of liquidity risk on principal payments? |
|
|
| (19) Comments: Mandatory overcollateralisation covering nominal value, interest payments and liquidation costs OR 102% of present value plus liquidation costs. | ||
| 11. Is there any grace period in case of a breach of liquidity risk mitigants? |
|
|
| 12. What is the consequence of not fixing a breach of liquidity risk mitigants? |
|
|
| . Monitoring of exposures to market and liquidity risk | ||
| 13. Who monitors the maintenance of coverage tests? |
|
|
| 14. Are there any regular public reporting requirements for market and liquidity risk? |
|
|
| . Overcollateralisation | ||
| 15. Is mandatory minimum overcollateralisation required? |
|
|
| (20) Comments: On top of legal requirement, voluntary commitments may be fixed in the bylaws. | ||
| 16. What is the level of minimum mandatory overcollateralisation? |
|
|
| (21) Comments: 2% plus costs (approx. 2%) if oc is calculated on the present value of the bonds and assets; the amount of interest payments plus costs if oc is calculated on nominal amounts. | (22) Comments: of the total volume of the bonds in circulation (Public and Mortgage Pfandbriefe) | |
| 17. If mandatory overcollateralisation is required, are the amounts above the minimum OC level protected? |
|
|
| 18. Is there any grace period in case of a breach of the coverage test? |
|
|
| 19. What is the consequence of not fixing a breach of the coverage test? |
|
|
| VI. COVER POOL MONITOR & BANKING SUPERVISION | ||
| 1. Is a special license required for the issuing of covered bonds? |
|
|
| 2. Are there special reporting duties of the covered bond issuer to the supervision authority concerning covered bonds and the cover pool, which go beyond the regular banking supervision? |
|
|
| 3. What is the role of the banking supervision regarding covered bonds? |
|
|
| (23) Comments: Austrian covered bond issuers are universal banks and therefore are subject to general banking supervision with respect to exposure to market risk and liqudity risk, valuation procedures and operational risk. | ||
| 4. Is there a special role of banking supervision in crisis regarding covered bonds? |
|
|
| 5. Is there a cover pool monitor independent from the issuer? |
|
|
| 6. If there is an independent cover pool monitor, what are its duties? |
|
|
| VII. SEGREGATION OF ASSETS & BANKRUPTCY REMOTENESS OF COVERED BONDS | ||
| 1. Do covered bonds automatically accelerate when the credit institution goes insolvent? |
|
|
| 2. What is the cover pool? |
|
|
| (24) Comments: Including derivatives entered into the cover register. | ||
| 3. How are the covered bondholders protected against claims from other creditors in case of insolvency of the issuer? |
|
|
| 4. Is there recourse to the credit institution’s insolvency estate upon a cover pool default? |
|
|
| 5. Are there provisions that require derivatives to continue in case of insolvency of the credit institution? |
|
|
| 6. If derivatives are permitted in the cover pool, what is their ranking? |
|
|
| VIII. RISK WEIGHTING & COMPLIANCE WITH EUROPEAN LEGISLATION | ||
| 1. Does the covered bond fulfil the criteria of UCITS 22(4)? |
|
|
| 2. Does the covered bond legislation completely fall within the criteria of the Annex VI, Part 1, Paragraph 68 (a) to (f) of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD)? |
|
|
| 3. Are listed covered bonds eligible in repo transactions with the national central bank? |
|
|
| 4. Are there any special investment regulations regarding covered bonds? |
|
|
| IX. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | ||
| 1. Link to National Association representing covered bond interests |
|
|
| 2. Link to national regulators and supervisors | ||
| 3. Fact Book Country Chapter |
|
|
| 4. Hypostat Country Chapter |
|
|
Comments for your selection