Printer friendly version Export to Excel

Frameworks from Switzerland

Questions Credit Suisse CB Swiss Pfandbriefe UBS CB
I. STRUCTURE OF THE ISSUER
1. Who is the issuer?
  • Universal credit institution
  • Specialized credit institution
  • Universal credit institution
(1) Comments: Swiss Pfandbrief law (PfG) Art.2: Only two Pfandbrief institutes (Pfandbriefbank schweizerischer Hypothekarinstitute AG, Pfandbriefzentrale der schweizerischen Kantonalbanken AG)
PfG Art. 5: Special banks with limited business scope (1. issuance of Swiss Pfandbriefe, 2. to grant loans to member banks, 3. invest the capital)
(2) Comments: Issued via UBS London branch, guaranteed by UBS Hypotheken AG
2. Does the bondholder have recourse to the credit institution?
  • Yes, direct
  • Yes, indirect
  • Yes, direct
(3) Comments: The bondholder has recourse to the Pfandbrief institute (PfG Art. 27 - 31). The bondholder does not have a direct recourse to the member banks. The Pfandbrief institutes, however, have a direct recourse to the member banks.
3. Who owns the cover assets?
  • SPE which guarantees the covered bonds
  • Credit institution, but pledged to the issuer (with transfer to the issuer upon trigger event)
  • SPE which guarantees the covered bonds
(4) Comments: The SPE is consolidated with the issuer for accounting purposes, the transfer exists only to ensure legal asset segregation. (5) Comments: Cover assets are owned by the member banks and pledged to Pfandbrief institutes.
(6) Comments: Guaranteed by UBS Hypotheken AG
4. Is the issuer the originator of the assets?
  • Yes
  • No
  • Yes
(7) Comments: The Pfandbrief institutes are the originators of the Swiss Pfandbriefe and the member banks are the originators of the mortgage loans.
II. FRAMEWORK
1. Are the bonds governed by a special covered bond Legislation?
  • No
  • Yes
  • No
(8) Comments: The legal basis of Swiss Pfandbriefe is the Pfandbrief law (PfG) established in 1931.
2. What is the legal framework for bankruptcy of the issuer of covered bonds?
  • General insolvency law
  • General insolvency law
  • Specific legal framework superseding the general insolvency law
  • General insolvency law
(9) Comments: Specific legal framework under PfG and Swiss Federal Banking Law on Banks and Saving Banks (Swiss Banking law) superseding the general insolvency law.
PfG Art. 14 - 26 and Swiss Banking law Art. 25 - 37.
(10) Comments: General Insolvency Law (and Banking ordance)
III. COVER ASSETS
1. What types of assets may be included in cover pools?
  • Mortgage loans (Mortgage loans for the purpose of this question are taken to include guaranteed real-estate loans.)
  • Mortgage loans (Mortgage loans for the purpose of this question are taken to include guaranteed real-estate loans.)
  • Mortgage loans (Mortgage loans for the purpose of this question are taken to include guaranteed real-estate loans.)
(11) Comments: Up to 15% of cover pool can be substitute assets. (12) Comments: Only first class mortgages on properties in Switzerland are eligible (PfG Art. 19 and 34 - 36).
95 % are residential, private single-family homes or apartment blocks and only 5 % commercial properties.
(13) Comments: Mortgage loans to private individuals.
Substitute assets may also include exposures to publc sector entities).
2. What is the geographical scope for public sector assets?
(14) Comments: n.a. (15) Comments: Not applicable. There are no public sector cover assets. (16) Comments: not applicable. (Can only be used as substitute assets).
3. What is the geographical scope for mortgage assets?
  • CH
  • Domestic
(17) Comments: Switzerland only.
4. Are regular covered bond specific disclosure requirements to the public mandatory?
  • No
  • Yes
  • Yes
(18) Comments: Although, in the absence of a law there is no mandatory reporting requirement both of the issuers to date have committed to provide detailed and regular disclosure. (19) Comments: PfG, Swiss Code of Obligations, Securities Exchange law, Swiss Banking law.
IV. VALUATION OF THE MORTGAGE COVER POOL & LTV CRITERIA
1. LTV is calculated using which valuation?[4]
  • Market value
  • Market value
  • Market value
(20) Comments: PfG Art. 34 - 36: The maximum LTV is 2/3 of market value. Detailed valuation regulation have to be authorised by the Federal finance department.
Mortgage lending value fixed by Pfandbrief institute completely independent of the member bank. The decision to accept a cover assets lies with Pfandbrief institute and not with member bank.
(21) Comments: Market value based on latest valuation.
2. Are there any special LTV limits used solely for calculating collateralisation rates for the cover pool (if yes, specify)?
  • Residential      
  • Residential      
    66.67 %
  • Residential      
    80%
(22) Comments: Credit Suisse allows mortgages with a higher LTV in the pool but only gives credit for the first 70%. (23) Comments: PfG Art 34 - 36: Max. 66.67 % or lower.
3. Do bondholders get the benefit of that portion of the loan which exceeds the LTV cap?
  • Yes
  • No
  • No
4a. Is there an LTV cap which makes the entire loan ineligible to be put in the cover pool (if yes, specify)?
  • Residential      
  • No
  • Residential      
(24) Comments: 100% (25) Comments: Eligibility criteria and LTVs have to be met continuously. (26) Comments: Residential - 80%
4b. Is there an LTV cap which would require a loan to be removed from the cover pool?
  • Residential      
  • No
  • No
(27) Comments: As above. (28) Comments: Eligibility criteria and LTVs have to be met continuously.
5. Is there any additional LTV limit on a portfolio basis?
  • No
  • Yes (if yes specify)
  • No
(29) Comments: E.g. at least 80 % of cover value after haircuts have to be residential mortgage loans.
V. ASSET-LIABILITY GUIDELINES
. Exposure to market risk
1. Is exposure to market risk (e.g. interest rate, currency risks) required to be mitigated by law or contract?
  • Yes
  • Yes
  • Yes
(30) Comments: By law there is no interest rate risk, no currency rate risk and no maturity mismatch.
2. What is the primary method for the mitigation of market risk?
  • Use of derivative hedge instruments
  • “Natural” matching (matching without the use of off-balance sheet instruments) and stress testing
  • Use of derivative hedge instruments
(31) Comments: By law matching between loans to member banks and Swiss Pfandbriefe, as both are denominated in CHF and have the same terms.
Derivatives are not used, as there are no currency rate risk, no interest rate risk and no maturity mismatch.
3. If the answer to the above question on market risk mitigation is “Use of derivative hedge instruments”, please specify whether those instruments are entered into:
  • By the time of issue of covered bonds or entry of asset in the cover pool
  • Not relevant
  • By the time of issue of covered bonds or entry of asset in the cover pool
(32) Comments: Hedges are entered into at incepation although cashflows, other than under a CSA are contingent on a trigger event. (33) Comments: Derivatives are not used, as there are no currency rate risk, no interest rate risk and no maturity mismatch.
4. What type of coverage test is applied?
  • Nominal cover
  • Present value cover
  • Nominal cover
  • Nominal cover
  • Present value cover
5. What is the frequency of coverage calculations?
  • Monthly
  • Daily
  • Monthly
6. What types of stress scenarios are applied?
  • Not relevant
  • Not relevant
  • Not relevant
(34) Comments: Not relevant, due to low LTV. Outstanding historical track. No loss since establishment of PfG (1931). (35) Comments: The program does not require the application of stress scenarios. However, such scenarios are taken into account by the rating agencies when calculating the required asset percentage which feeds indirectly into the coverage tests we perform.
7. What is the frequency of stress test calculations?
  • Not relevant
  • Not relevant
  • Not relevant
(36) Comments: Not relevant, due to low LTV. Outstanding historical track. No loss since establishment of PfG (1931).
. Exposure to liquidity risk
8. Is exposure to liquidity risk required to be mitigated by law or contract?
  • No
  • Yes
  • Yes
(37) Comments: By law.
9. What is the primary method for the mitigation of liquidity risk on interest payments?
  • Contractual arrangements, e.g. a requirement to establish a reserve fund
  • “Natural” matching (matching without the use of off-balance sheet instruments) and stress testing (Natural matching is taken to include replacing CBs with new issues, as well as substitute assets.)
  • Liquidity facilities
  • Contractual arrangements, e.g. a requirement to establish a reserve fund
  • Contractual arrangements, e.g. a requirement to establish a reserve fund
(38) Comments: Risk management and limits include:
1) Law requires cash flow matching between loans to member banks and Swiss Pfandbriefe
2) Substantial free assets in liquid form (repo capable: SNB GC bond basket holdings can be repoed against CHF to EUREX counterparties)
3) Several cash flow concentration limits per member bank, monitored daily
4) Maturity extension for defined contracts (private placements of Swiss Pfandbriefe of "Limmat" program).
10. What is the primary method for the mitigation of liquidity risk on principal payments?
  • Contractual arrangements, e.g. maturity extension or prematurity test
  • Natural matching (matching without the use of off-balance sheet instruments) and stress testing
  • Liquidity facilities
  • Contractual arrangements, e.g. maturity extension or prematurity test
  • Contractual arrangements, e.g. maturity extension or prematurity test
(39) Comments: Risk management and limits include:
1) Law requires cash flow matching between loans to member banks and Swiss Pfandbriefe
2) Substantial free assets in liquid form (repo capable: SNB GC bond basket holdings can be repoed against CHF to EUREX counterparties)
3) Several cash flow concentration limits per member bank, monitored daily
4) Maturity extension for defined contracts (private placements of Swiss Pfandbriefe of "Limmat" program).
11. Is there any grace period in case of a breach of liquidity risk mitigants?
  • At the discretion of the relevant party
  • No
  • No
(40) Comments: A breach of the pre-maturity test gives the Guarantor the right to take action immediately.
12. What is the consequence of not fixing a breach of liquidity risk mitigants?
  • Event of default of the issuer
  • Other regulatory or rule-based action
  • Event of default of the issuer
(41) Comments: A breach of liquidity risk mitigants is not allowed as the liquidity buffer is stipulated by law.
. Monitoring of exposures to market and liquidity risk
13. Who monitors the maintenance of coverage tests?
  • Trustee/cover pool monitor
  • Other
  • Trustee/cover pool monitor
(42) Comments: The Swiss Pfandbrief system is twofold. The two Swiss Pfandbrief institutes are the outsourced cover pool of their member banks. The Pfandbrief institutes value the coverage (only mortgages) completely independent of the member banks and supervise them daily.
14. Are there any regular public reporting requirements for market and liquidity risk?
  • Yes
  • Yes
  • Yes
(43) Comments: By issuer commitment rather than by statute. (44) Comments: Reports to member banks, rating agency, auditors, shareholders, Federal Finance Department, Swiss exchange authorities, corporate website.
. Overcollateralisation
15. Is mandatory minimum overcollateralisation required?
  • By contractual obligation
  • By legislation/regulation
  • By contractual obligation
(45) Comments: Yes, by Swiss Pfandbrief law and Swiss Financial Market Authority (FINMA) regulations.
16. What is the level of minimum mandatory overcollateralisation?

  • 11%

  • 8 %

  • 11%
(46) Comments: Via the asset percentage term in the ACT. (47) Comments: Overcollateralisation of at least 8 % is measured after valuation of mortgage loan and individual LTV of max. 66.7 %.
17. If mandatory overcollateralisation is required, are the amounts above the minimum OC level protected?
  • Yes
  • Yes
  • Yes
18. Is there any grace period in case of a breach of the coverage test?
  • Length of period:
  • No
  • Length of period:
    Within next Test Date (one month)
(48) Comments: De facto 1 month. A breach will occur if the ACT is not met on two consecuritve test dates.
19. What is the consequence of not fixing a breach of the coverage test?
  • Event of default of the issuer
  • Redirection of cashflows
  • Other regulatory or rule-based actions
  • Event of default of the issuer
(49) Comments: Inter alia cashflows are redirected after a breach occurs. If this breach is not rsolved by the next Test Date (one month later) an Issuer EOD occurs. (50) Comments: Law based action by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).
A breach of liquidity risk mitigants is not allowed as the liquidity buffer is stipulated by law.
VI. COVER POOL MONITOR & BANKING SUPERVISION
1. Is a special license required for the issuing of covered bonds?
  • No
  • Yes with additional requirements compared to general banking supervision regulations
  • No
(51) Comments: Yes, as per Pfandbrief law only the two Swiss Pfandbrief institutes are legally permitted to issue Swiss Pfandbriefe.
2. Are there special reporting duties of the covered bond issuer to the supervision authority concerning covered bonds and the cover pool, which go beyond the regular banking supervision?
  • No
  • Periodic reporting required
  • No
(52) Comments: Yes, according to Swiss Pfandbrief law.
3. What is the role of the banking supervision regarding covered bonds?
  • No special role
  • No special role
(53) Comments: Supervision of the Swiss Pfandbrief institutes, the issuance of Swiss Pfandbriefe and the member banks.
4. Is there a special role of banking supervision in crisis regarding covered bonds?
  • No specific role
  • No specific role
(54) Comments: Yes, based on Swiss Pfandbrief law and Swiss Banking law.
5. Is there a cover pool monitor independent from the issuer?
  • Yes
  • Yes
  • Yes
(55) Comments: The Pfandbrief institutes select and valuate the cover pool fully independent of the member bank (who grants the mortgage to the house owner) and supervises the cover pool daily.
6. If there is an independent cover pool monitor, what are its duties?
  • Verification of coverage tests
  • Verification of coverage tests
(56) Comments: See answer above (VI.5)
VII. SEGREGATION OF ASSETS & BANKRUPTCY REMOTENESS OF COVERED BONDS
1. Do covered bonds automatically accelerate when the credit institution goes insolvent?
  • No
  • No
  • No
(57) Comments: If a member bank goes insolvent (as opposed to a Swiss Pfandbrief institute), the Swiss Pfandbriefe will be satisfied according to the conditions of the issue and they will be repaid at the time of their contractual maturity. Automatic acceleration only occurs in a case of bankruptcy of the Pfandbrief institute.
2. What is the cover pool?
  • All assets pledged
  • All assets on the cover register
  • All assets pledged
(58) Comments: The cover pool consists only of eligible mortgage loans as per cover pool register. (59) Comments: (All assets transferred for security purpose).
3. How are the covered bondholders protected against claims from other creditors in case of insolvency of the issuer?
  • Transfer of assets to an SPE
(60) Comments: There are no significant other creditors than Pfandbrief bondholders due to special bank principle.
(61) Comments: UBS Hypotheken AG fulfills duties under Covered Bonds (Bankruptcy remoteness of guarantor including non-petition and limited recourse).
4. Is there recourse to the credit institution’s insolvency estate upon a cover pool default?
  • Yes, pari passu with unsecured creditors
  • Yes, pari passu with unsecured creditors
  • Yes, pari passu with unsecured creditors
5. Are there provisions that require derivatives to continue in case of insolvency of the credit institution?
  • Yes
  • Yes
(62) Comments: n.a. (no derivative instrument)
6. If derivatives are permitted in the cover pool, what is their ranking?
  • Pari passu to covered bond holders
  • Pari passu to covered bond holders
(63) Comments: n.a. (derivatives are not permitted by law)
VIII. RISK WEIGHTING & COMPLIANCE WITH EUROPEAN LEGISLATION
1. Does the covered bond fulfil the criteria of UCITS 22(4)?
  • No
  • Yes
  • No
2. Does the covered bond legislation completely fall within the criteria of the Annex VI, Part 1, Paragraph 68 (a) to (f) of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD)?
  • No
  • Yes
  • No
(64) Comments: Following Swiss regulation.
3. Are listed covered bonds eligible in repo transactions with the national central bank?
  • Yes
  • Yes
  • Yes
(65) Comments: Part of SNB GC Basket (CHF)
(66) Comments: With SNB, (also ECB as senior corporate bond).
4. Are there any special investment regulations regarding covered bonds?
  • No
  • Yes
  • No
(67) Comments: Defined by law.
IX. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
1. Link to National Association representing covered bond interests
  • Association
  • Association
  • Association
2. Link to national regulators and supervisors
  • List
3. Fact Book Country Chapter
  • Chapter
  • Chapter
  • Chapter
 
4. Hypostat Country Chapter
  • Chapter
  • Chapter
  • Chapter

Comments for your selection

  • 1: Swiss Pfandbrief law (PfG) Art.2: Only two Pfandbrief institutes (Pfandbriefbank schweizerischer Hypothekarinstitute AG, Pfandbriefzentrale der schweizerischen Kantonalbanken AG) PfG Art. 5: Special banks with limited business scope (1. issuance of Swiss Pfandbriefe, 2. to grant loans to member banks, 3. invest the capital)
  • 2: Issued via UBS London branch, guaranteed by UBS Hypotheken AG
  • 3: The bondholder has recourse to the Pfandbrief institute (PfG Art. 27 - 31). The bondholder does not have a direct recourse to the member banks. The Pfandbrief institutes, however, have a direct recourse to the member banks.
  • 4: The SPE is consolidated with the issuer for accounting purposes, the transfer exists only to ensure legal asset segregation.
  • 5: Cover assets are owned by the member banks and pledged to Pfandbrief institutes.
  • 6: Guaranteed by UBS Hypotheken AG
  • 7: The Pfandbrief institutes are the originators of the Swiss Pfandbriefe and the member banks are the originators of the mortgage loans.
  • 8: The legal basis of Swiss Pfandbriefe is the Pfandbrief law (PfG) established in 1931.
  • 9: Specific legal framework under PfG and Swiss Federal Banking Law on Banks and Saving Banks (Swiss Banking law) superseding the general insolvency law. PfG Art. 14 - 26 and Swiss Banking law Art. 25 - 37.
  • 10: General Insolvency Law (and Banking ordance)
  • 11: Up to 15% of cover pool can be substitute assets.
  • 12: Only first class mortgages on properties in Switzerland are eligible (PfG Art. 19 and 34 - 36). 95 % are residential, private single-family homes or apartment blocks and only 5 % commercial properties.
  • 13: Mortgage loans to private individuals. Substitute assets may also include exposures to publc sector entities).
  • 14: n.a.
  • 15: Not applicable. There are no public sector cover assets.
  • 16: not applicable. (Can only be used as substitute assets).
  • 17: Switzerland only.
  • 18: Although, in the absence of a law there is no mandatory reporting requirement both of the issuers to date have committed to provide detailed and regular disclosure.
  • 19: PfG, Swiss Code of Obligations, Securities Exchange law, Swiss Banking law.
  • 20: PfG Art. 34 - 36: The maximum LTV is 2/3 of market value. Detailed valuation regulation have to be authorised by the Federal finance department. Mortgage lending value fixed by Pfandbrief institute completely independent of the member bank. The decision to accept a cover assets lies with Pfandbrief institute and not with member bank.
  • 21: Market value based on latest valuation.
  • 22: Credit Suisse allows mortgages with a higher LTV in the pool but only gives credit for the first 70%.
  • 23: PfG Art 34 - 36: Max. 66.67 % or lower.
  • 24: 100%
  • 25: Eligibility criteria and LTVs have to be met continuously.
  • 26: Residential - 80%
  • 27: As above.
  • 28: Eligibility criteria and LTVs have to be met continuously.
  • 29: E.g. at least 80 % of cover value after haircuts have to be residential mortgage loans.
  • 30: By law there is no interest rate risk, no currency rate risk and no maturity mismatch.
  • 31: By law matching between loans to member banks and Swiss Pfandbriefe, as both are denominated in CHF and have the same terms. Derivatives are not used, as there are no currency rate risk, no interest rate risk and no maturity mismatch.
  • 32: Hedges are entered into at incepation although cashflows, other than under a CSA are contingent on a trigger event.
  • 33: Derivatives are not used, as there are no currency rate risk, no interest rate risk and no maturity mismatch.
  • 34: Not relevant, due to low LTV. Outstanding historical track. No loss since establishment of PfG (1931).
  • 35: The program does not require the application of stress scenarios. However, such scenarios are taken into account by the rating agencies when calculating the required asset percentage which feeds indirectly into the coverage tests we perform.
  • 36: Not relevant, due to low LTV. Outstanding historical track. No loss since establishment of PfG (1931).
  • 37: By law.
  • 38: Risk management and limits include: 1) Law requires cash flow matching between loans to member banks and Swiss Pfandbriefe 2) Substantial free assets in liquid form (repo capable: SNB GC bond basket holdings can be repoed against CHF to EUREX counterparties) 3) Several cash flow concentration limits per member bank, monitored daily 4) Maturity extension for defined contracts (private placements of Swiss Pfandbriefe of "Limmat" program).
  • 39: Risk management and limits include: 1) Law requires cash flow matching between loans to member banks and Swiss Pfandbriefe 2) Substantial free assets in liquid form (repo capable: SNB GC bond basket holdings can be repoed against CHF to EUREX counterparties) 3) Several cash flow concentration limits per member bank, monitored daily 4) Maturity extension for defined contracts (private placements of Swiss Pfandbriefe of "Limmat" program).
  • 40: A breach of the pre-maturity test gives the Guarantor the right to take action immediately.
  • 41: A breach of liquidity risk mitigants is not allowed as the liquidity buffer is stipulated by law.
  • 42: The Swiss Pfandbrief system is twofold. The two Swiss Pfandbrief institutes are the outsourced cover pool of their member banks. The Pfandbrief institutes value the coverage (only mortgages) completely independent of the member banks and supervise them daily.
  • 43: By issuer commitment rather than by statute.
  • 44: Reports to member banks, rating agency, auditors, shareholders, Federal Finance Department, Swiss exchange authorities, corporate website.
  • 45: Yes, by Swiss Pfandbrief law and Swiss Financial Market Authority (FINMA) regulations.
  • 46: Via the asset percentage term in the ACT.
  • 47: Overcollateralisation of at least 8 % is measured after valuation of mortgage loan and individual LTV of max. 66.7 %.
  • 48: De facto 1 month. A breach will occur if the ACT is not met on two consecuritve test dates.
  • 49: Inter alia cashflows are redirected after a breach occurs. If this breach is not rsolved by the next Test Date (one month later) an Issuer EOD occurs.
  • 50: Law based action by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). A breach of liquidity risk mitigants is not allowed as the liquidity buffer is stipulated by law.
  • 51: Yes, as per Pfandbrief law only the two Swiss Pfandbrief institutes are legally permitted to issue Swiss Pfandbriefe.
  • 52: Yes, according to Swiss Pfandbrief law.
  • 53: Supervision of the Swiss Pfandbrief institutes, the issuance of Swiss Pfandbriefe and the member banks.
  • 54: Yes, based on Swiss Pfandbrief law and Swiss Banking law.
  • 55: The Pfandbrief institutes select and valuate the cover pool fully independent of the member bank (who grants the mortgage to the house owner) and supervises the cover pool daily.
  • 56: See answer above (VI.5)
  • 57: If a member bank goes insolvent (as opposed to a Swiss Pfandbrief institute), the Swiss Pfandbriefe will be satisfied according to the conditions of the issue and they will be repaid at the time of their contractual maturity. Automatic acceleration only occurs in a case of bankruptcy of the Pfandbrief institute.
  • 58: The cover pool consists only of eligible mortgage loans as per cover pool register.
  • 59: (All assets transferred for security purpose).
  • 60: There are no significant other creditors than Pfandbrief bondholders due to special bank principle.
  • 61: UBS Hypotheken AG fulfills duties under Covered Bonds (Bankruptcy remoteness of guarantor including non-petition and limited recourse).
  • 62: n.a. (no derivative instrument)
  • 63: n.a. (derivatives are not permitted by law)
  • 64: Following Swiss regulation.
  • 65: Part of SNB GC Basket (CHF)
  • 66: With SNB, (also ECB as senior corporate bond).
  • 67: Defined by law.